TRANSGENDER?

 Okay, I understand that there are people who seem to think they were born the wrong gender. And a lot of people used to make fun of them for having that belief. Sometimes people who were homosexuals were physically attacked and even murdered and of course that was never acceptable. That's why legislation was passed in 2009 that created another special class of  protected individuals in the USA; homosexuals that were victims of crimes, essentially adding them to the protected classes of people covered in the hate crimes legislation passed in 1968. Race discrimination is wrong. Nobody should be discriminated against based on the race they were born obviously because nobody can do anything about their race.

Homosexuality is a little harder to protect since it is behavior related and not a condition of a persons birth. We are all born either male or female, and a certain race or combination of races. Moreover we aren't being coerced into believing a black person is actually hispanic or white. Transgender occurs when a person undergoes a sex change procedure that can involve chemicals, surgery, or both. Supposedly once a person has completed the transgender process that person has changed their sex from male to female. The fact that the person remains whatever gender they were when they were born is ignored by people who really want us to play the 'sex change' game. 

People who go through this process usually change the way they dress and their name and they expect all of us to respect their 'new' identity. Inevitably that leads to confusion, fear, anxiety, anger, and a host of other problems, especially when we learned that men are still stronger than women and have a physical advantage even though they now claim to be women. How does that happen? Because they still haven't been able to actually change a man into a woman.  Some people, ME, cannot accept the fantasy that a person is 'assigned' a gender at birth. That doesn't make any sense and it goes against thousands of years of science and tradition. 

The term 'transgender' has been around since the 1920's apparently, but began to pick up popularity during the 1960's, a period of time we could best describe as the years of insanity. Since then some so called 'doctors' have learned how to make physical changes to make it look like people can change their sex, but the fact remains that there are only two genders and wishing there were more just doesn't work. The lie that we are assigned a gender at birth goes against any known medical science. So the people who claim to revere science when they are lying about man made global warming, abhor science when we are telling the truth about gender. 

How women are falling into the transgender trap is a real puzzle. Women, with a few exceptions, are allowing men take all the trophies in women's sports. Men are modeling women's bathing suits, dresses, underwear, feminine hygiene products, and they're getting named Woman of the Year in some publications. Why are women so willing to give up all the hard earned progress they've made? Women aren't making any sense to me now. They had to fight for the right to vote, the right to apply for any job without fear of being discriminated against because of their gender, the right to equal sporting opportunities, and now they're throwing all that away because some men want to pretend to be women so they can take over women's sports? Is it because women assume that transgenders support the right to have an abortion whenever you want, including while giving birth? Is allowing partial birth abortion more important than every other right women have? Alright then, give up all of your rights. 

And we're not just talking about women's sports. Now women have more competition when looking for employment. In addition to real men who are applying for the same jobs, they are competing with other men pretending to be women, and also enjoy protected status. The only demographic being served by this madness is real men. Real men aren't concerned about women taking over the NFL or men's college sports or any other area of their lives. Real men are pretty much in the same position as before. The onslaught of more women applying for jobs won't hurt real men because there is no offset of fake women pretending to be men. As pathetic as this is, I find it a little humorous. Women have actually voted themselves right back into second class status. Transgender people as a specially protected class will get priority to real women when applying for a job. Women of America, give yourselves a hand. You have just voted to lower yourselves to a class just barely above slavery right when you were finally getting the rights you deserve. 

This entire conversation is insane. "Why? Democrats ask." "Is it because you don't like it?" 

Actually no. Whether you like it or not the fact remains that you cannot change your gender. No one is assigned a gender at birth, we were all born male or female. I don't like the argument that we can change our gender because it is a waste of time and it is cruel to tell anyone, especially children, that a mistake was made when they were born. It is destructive to an entire society to entertain such a fantasy. You can change your appearance and tell everybody that you are now a different gender and your name is no longer Gerry, now you are Geraldine, but you are still Gerry. And I know that because there are only two genders. 

When kids reach the age when they are interested in the opposite sex, what are they supposed to do? Is the transgender girl supposed to tell a potential suitor that she used to be a boy and still has some boy parts? Or even that he has changed all of his equipment and is now a 'real' girl? Or does the lie continue until the young man who thinks he is dating a young woman finally figures it all out, and feels completely betrayed, even mentally damaged perhaps for the rest of his life? 

These are questions we are not allowed to ask in the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave. The democrat party has all but eviscerated the Constitution. We no longer have freedom of speech especially on college campuses where it is needed the most. No one who has a job dares utter a word that is out of step with democrat demagoguery. If you are a student at most major universities if you expect to graduate you better goose step to the tune of the mental midgets running the place (think Horst Wessel, you'll get an A+). It is already dangerous to refer to anyone at the workplace, or especially the classroom, as 'he' or 'she', instead we are to refer to each other as 'they' or 'them'. And all they are doing is following the science; there are way more than two genders. So many that they can't be counted because science is inventing new genders all the time. I know it's just plain mean to tell the truth because democrats believe that if you really believe something it becomes the truth. I don't hate to burst your crazy bubble; that is insane. 

How foolish we've been for all these years. We always were taught that in order to maintain a certain level of population growth we needed a male and a female. Anything else was going to fail. That's what we used to think, what a bunch of dummies! It was the worst case of misinformation in the entire history of humankind (whew! I almost said mankind and that's pretty much a death sentence). No wonder Uncle Joe wanted to institute a Ministry of Free Speech. It is obvious that we need one (at least for those of us who dare to think). 

If there is anyone more out of touch with reality than a democrat they can only be found in such bastions of freedom as the Russian Federation, Pyongyang, North Korea, and Beijing, China. And of course there are lots of countries in the Middle East and the African Continent who share the same ideology as the average American democrat. Soon it will be a crime to tell the truth about transgenderism. When that happens I will be locked up because I will always refuse to support the lie that men can be women and women can be men. 

Similarly I will never agree that there are more than two genders. Keep It Simple Stupid! There are only two; male and female. 

SCHOOL SHOOTING

Six people are dead at a school in Nashville, Tennessee. Three of them are children, two girls and a boy all under the age of ten. And three adults, one man and two women, all over the age of sixty. It is hard to manage my thoughts and emotions when something like this happens. And as tired as I am of hearing about mass murders anywhere, but especially at schools, I am really tired of democrats immediately using the images of people who have been brutally murdered as political pawns. Until democrats prove me wrong I'll continue to make my case that democrats couldn't care less about shooting victims, including children. I'll go a step further and show that democrats really don't care about children at all. To them children are tools to be used to help them in their quest for power. Nothing more. 

I watched with great sadness the news that six people had been murdered by a person with a black heart and evil intent. And with one exception every single 'news' (propaganda) organization began with self righteous 'reporters' saying over and over again, "I'm just sick and tired of reporting this type of event. Enough is enough. When are we going to do something about this, when are Republicans going to wake up and put an end to GUN VIOLENCE and pass 'common sense' gun gun control laws?" Then quit if that's the best you can do. Accusing half of the people in America of supporting mass murder is sickening. I'm sick and tired of democrats posing as reporters using their position on TV to promote their political agenda. I was always taught that reporters are supposed to be objective about their findings, but evidently that isn't taught anymore. 

There are a couple of objective facts regarding people who commit mass murder using a firearm. The first fact is that they are deeply deranged, but something caused them to commit evil acts. Second they used a gun to kill people but the gun didn't kill anyone. What's missing from the self righteous rants of these editorialists posing as reporters is the fact that a gun is an inanimate object. Inanimate objects can't act on their own. No gun has ever killed or wounded anyone. Another fact is that not that long ago mass murder, was something that just never happened. In their effort to water down the Constitution and erode our rights democrats have invented a concept called gun violence. Democrats like to use words as weapons instead of tools to be used to educate people. Things like 'climate change', gun violence, transgender, are all subjects democrats use to divide and conquer a nation. The umbrella phrase 'reproductive rights' is another favorite and we shouldn't forget 'equity' which is a huge umbrella designed to allow men to take over women's sports and make us feel guilty enough to pay billions of dollars in so-called reparations to people who have not suffered any loss and therefore there is no basis to even have a discussion about reparations. The people involved were never victims of any type of injustice caused by the people of California. Inventing words and phrases, and over using old words and phrases are tools used to destroy a freedom loving society. Tools that are used by the democrat party.  

It's hard to believe that a group of people who believe that abortion should be legal during a live birth really cares at all about children. How am I supposed to make the leap from murdering babies (which an 'abortion' of a baby in the process of being born is) to "I'm sick and tired of reporting about the gun violence in our schools, which is a euphemism for "We need to take away a person's right to self defense!" A small but powerful group of people is attempting to change American culture and they are having a disappointing amount of success. It has taken several decades, but Americans are giving in to the idea that guns do actually kill people. It's impossible, but they believe it anyway. 

Three children and three other school officials have been brutally murdered and ninety nine percent of the so-called reporters only want to push their political agenda. They constantly claim that shootings are the main cause of death among children. According to the CDC accidents are the leading cause of death among children. The second leading cause of death is suicide. Journalism is pretty close to dead in America so what difference does it make if we lie about the numbers? It's the political power that counts. It would help a great deal if democrats started exhibiting some common sense in all facets of life. Scaring the stuffing out of kids at school with all of the man made global warming nonsense, telling white kids they are racist bigots who can't help themselves so they need to keep their mouths shut, and then topping it off with, "Hey! It's ok if you don't know if you are a girl or a boy. You might think you are a boy because some dumb doctor put that label on you when you were born and your well meaning, but misguided parents have let you think that, but you get to choose which one you'd rather be." 

I believe that is contributing to an apparently horribly class of individual who has become so confused by all of this that they don't know what to think or how to act. Listening to the 'news' we get the feeling that mass murders are happening all the time, and the incidents of mass shootings may be more frequent than in former years, but the truth is that of the tens of millions of gun owners those who commit murder are such a small percentage that it is barely  measurable.  So what's the common sense approach? Democrats think that hamstringing all gun owners is the answer. The truth in my opinion is that they want to confiscate guns from all law abiding gun owners. They can't disarm the murderers and the crazies because those people don't care about the law and they are very happy to allow Big Brother to disarm law abiding people because it gives them one less thing to worry about when they want to use their gun to commit a crime. That kind of common sense makes sense to those who want to harm others.

How about the 99+ percent of those who would never use a gun to commit crime? Does it make sense to take away their right to self defense? I really don't understand the democrat mind. It doesn't make any sense at all to me to raise a generation of kids who live in constant fear and uncertainty and anger. So the purpose of this essay is not to address the evil inherent in school shootings, hopefully most Americans can already understand that. Unfortunately democrats view such scenes as opportunities to seize more power over their neighbors. I hope  Americans will be less emotional when looking for ways to prevent such evil acts. One of the mantra's of the democrat party is, 'ever let a good tragedy go to waste'. That is a sick and twisted way to view life. 

Let's avoid that trap and focus on ways to improve the lives of every person living in America and not look upon any tragedy as a political opportunity. We need to nurture our children and teach them basic principles of right and wrong and to respect others. We need to let them know that in today's world of social media they need to be strong. If some shithead, or even a group of them, lures a child into an embarrassing situation and then posts it on whatever, children need to realize that it's not going away. It will resurface from time to time and it's not the end of the world, shrug it off. We need to help children understand that an embarrassing moment even if it is repeated from time to time is not the end of the world. It happens to a lot of people, from school age to the rich and famous. It's just part of living in the world today. And while we're at it, let's realize that grown ups have a responsibility to point out the possible problems the internet can cause and teach there children how to avoid finding themselves in an embarrassing situation in the first place. There used to be a woman on the radio who gave a lot of great advice to everyone. She was highly rated and lots of people loved listening to her, me included. 

She had a shithead boyfriend a long time ago and their relationship went sour and he lacked the maturity to handle it so he posted some embarrassing photographs of her on the internet. She didn't talk about it, but a caller asked her about it one day. It was probably a friend of her low life ex-boyfriend. She was married by then and had been for a long time and she didn't want to talk about it, but she had a the courage to face the call head on. Instead of getting hot under the collar and all embarrassed about it she used it as a teaching moment. She talked about insecure morons that do things like that to people especially when the victim is in a position of weakness. The thing to do is realize that yeah, some people will use those embarrassing moments to try to make themselves look superior, but in fact they are displaying their own insecurities, putting them on display for all the world to see. So if looking at things like that makes you feel like a better person go ahead and look, but for the radio personality it was a long time ago and she had risen above it and improved her life through education, hard work and dedication to a life of helping others. 

We need to teach our children first how to avoid becoming victims to such traps, but if that fails follow the example of other people who were once victims but found the courage and fortitude to rise above. The world is becoming a dangerous place and parents need to talk to their kids as often as they can. If the kid doesn't want to talk then find a way. A parent has more life experience than any fourteen year old kid and they need to have the wisdom and patience to get through to that kid. Too many parents come home from work tired and fed up with the problems that they face not realizing that their kids are coming home just as confused and frustrated or even worse. A parent has been fourteen their kid has never been thirty-five. 

Strong kids don't grow up to be mass murderers. Neither do kids who are confident in who they are. If schools can't stop teaching our kids that they don't know the difference between a boy and a girl then it's time to take our kids out of public school. It's ok to teach a kid who seems to be confused about their own gender identity issues that they are important and they need to take time to consider what they believe before deciding to make any life altering changes. It's necessary for teachers to teach children to respect each other, including those who may be confused about being a boy or a girl. We should not make fun of people just because they are different. At the same time we can't have schools allowing the dangerous practice of allowing boys to use girls facilities no matter what gender they think they are. Until there is incontrovertible evidence that there are more than two genders we need to continue to identify boys and boys and girls as girls. There have been several times when school administrators felt the need to hide the fact that a girl had been raped by boys who were allowed access to girls facilities. They feel the need to do that because they are afraid of the tsunami of complaints that parents would make when they found out that administrators don't care about the safety of girls and young women entrusted to their care. I'm not aware of a single boy being sexually molested by girls in boys restrooms or locker rooms. Let's be perfectly clear about this obvious fact; boys do not belong in girl's locker rooms or bathrooms! Boys do not belong in women's sports! Understand? It's simple English. 

How have American parents become such cowards? Or maybe they are just overworked and don't know what they can do in the face of so much opposition from all sides. And while I'm on the subject let me say that any police officer or any other law enforcement official who would arrest a parent for protesting the practice of allowing boys to use girls facilities should turn in their badge and gun. You are not a law enforcement officer when you are violating the Constitution because some politician tells you it is alright. During my thirty five years in law enforcement I refused to make an illegal arrest more than once and it cost me a promotion at least once and I didn't regret it at all. I still don't. All men and women in law enforcement take an oath to defend the Constitution not some dirty politician with an agenda. Unfortunately I did know some police officers who were willing to make illegal arrests when ordered to do so. 

All Americans need to pay attention to what is happening in public schools and be willing to stand up to administrators who try to bully them into supporting practices that are wrong. All Americans need to stand for something. They need to stand for Constitutional values and not be confused by counterfeits. There is such a thing as right and wrong. Laws exist for a good reason. It is good to help other people in need. Exploiting women is bad. Protecting women and children is good. Being polite to each other is a good thing. Being polite doesn't mean a person is weak, it means they are polite. Only insecure people become bullies. The police are our friends. Gang members are our enemies. If a boy thinks he's a girl work with him and help him understand that being a boy is a good thing. The same with girls.

If that child persists then don't make fun of something they really believe, but don't force everyone else to acknowledge something that can never be; boys cannot be girls, neither can girls be boys and we should never force children to think or act otherwise. Never tell a child that their parents have been lying to them about their gender and never subject a child to gender change therapy without the involvement of the parents. If the parents refuse to allow the gender change that is the end of the discussion. The same with pornography. Too many democrats believe that pornography is healthy for children. It isn't. Since democrats often resort to changing the meaning of words it is nearly impossible to have a meaningful conversation with them about most important topics. 

Adults need to devise a method of respecting each other so children can learn the benefits of maintaining a respectful discourse. Any book containing explicit sexual content should not be allowed in any public school, grades K-12. Parents who wish to expose their children to damaging literature are free to shop online for any smut they desire. It's simple respect for everyone, something democrats say they want while they are doing everything they can to eliminate. Most laws are good. When there is a law that is harmful people need to use the political process to change it. We spend billions of dollars providing special training to police officers and we expect them to help keep us safe. They should be respected and supported. If they commit a crime they should be removed from their office or prosecuted. They should be obeyed when they are performing their duties. 

Parents should be respected above all. No one cares more about a child's welfare than the child's parents. We also spend billions of dollars training teachers. Teachers should be respected and obeyed while they are engaged in the education of our children. They should never attempt to supplant the role of a parent. Parents should be in charge of the curriculum presented to their children and if they object to any part of it their objections should be taken very seriously. These are all things that help children feel secure in their surroundings. When teachers tell children their parents are leading them astray that is damaging to them. There is no way to justify the practice of school administrators telling children that they don't need to tell their parents everything that takes place in school because their parents may not be able to handle the realities of the modern world. 

When educators notice that what they are doing is creating conflict at a child's home they need to re-evaluate what they are doing. If we can ever have any hope of stopping mass shootings anywhere we have to get back to the basic teachings of a civilized nation. Respect for others. We never used to allow pornography in school. We never told children to obey teachers and respect them over their parents; it just wasn't done. We never told children to ignore basic human experience and call boys girls and girls boys. Not long ago we just wanted to protect children and create a protective environment where they could learn to read and write and work and achieve and succeed. Those environments were comforting and successful and the thought of shooting a bunch of classmates and teachers never entered anyone's mind.

Today we do the opposite and the result is confusion, mistrust, and violence. Democrats blame inanimate objects, hopefully Americans are smarter than that and can look deeper to find the root cause and begin to raise a new generation of well adjusted adults who will in turn teach their children to be respectful and nurturing. Take away one inanimate object and there will be another one just as bad or worse. Teach children the benefits of treating each other with respect and how important it is to work hard and succeed in life and mass murder will become a thing of the past. 

MORE FBI

Seriously folks, how much more of this can we take from what is arguably the most important law enforcement agency in the country? I don't expect them to have no political leanings but I do expect them to be honest and put their idiotic political opinions aside when they are discharging the duties of their job. I expect any law enforcement organization from the FBI to the smallest department in the country to at least know the elements of the crime they are trying to prove. 

There is no way to prove that what happened at the Capitol building on January 6th was more than a protest that turned into a riot. The FBI has been abusing their authority and putting hundreds of people in prison for crimes they know their victims did not commit. The majority of the people inside the Capitol that day knew they shouldn't be there, but none of them were carrying guns. Perhaps a dozen or so carried any type of weapon at all. Yet the FBI has set out to prove that thousands of them were armed insurrectionists and federal judges are letting this charade play out. The worst part of this is that it's just part of a continuing effort to discredit one man simply because democrats are afraid of him and actually hate him and the FBI has been working for the democrat party since the day king Barry took the oath of office. 

Fear is a fierce motivator and it is being used to scare all Americans into fighting each other over nonsense that no one really believes once they take the time to think about the issue being discussed. Just look at the misinformation being spread by the media and the FBI about the protest that day. 

PRESIDENT TRUMP ORGANIZED AN ARMED INSURRECTION AGAINST AMERICA

The only source for this claim is an obscure assistant to President Trump's Chief of Staff Mark Meadows named Cassidy Hutchinson. Cassidy has been touted by a tribunal that would make Joseph Stalin proud. I'd love to know what the democrats promised her in return for her perjured testimony before the January Six Congressional committee. She claims to have been in attendance at some high level meetings which is not likely considering her age and position. With a Bachelor's degree in political science from an unknown university in Virginia she would not have been present at any serious planning meetings, certainly not a meeting where the president planned the armed take over of the government. Most likely she was bring coffee, pastries, pens, pencils, notebooks, whatever the people actually involved in the government whatever items they needed. Possibly a young and impressionable idealist she may have heard pieces of sentences and words that allowed her to concoct a story about January Six turning it into some sort of fantasy involving an 'armed' rebellion made up of people who wanted to take over the country.

Nobody has ever testified that anyone involved in the protest was armed except for the law enforcement personnel who were present. 

FIVE POLICE OFFICERS DIED IN THE VIOLENCE THAT DAY

There may have been some people who died at or near the Capitol building that day, but none of them died as a result of any violence (except for Ashli Babbitt) during the protest and none of them were police officers. 

The only person who died at the Capitol that day was murdered by a Capitol police officer named Michael Byrd.  Ashli Babbitt was an unarmed woman who was killed by a frightened police officer as she attempted to enter the chamber he was in via a broken window. There were a number of other armed police officers in the same hallway he was in and none of them fired any shots at all.  And there were several others just a few yards behind the group Ashli was part of and none of them fired any shots either. Luckily for Byrd this was a protest supporting President Trump who is hated by the democrats and the democrats control federal law enforcement in America.

No major news source hates the police more than CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, and CBS. They couldn't care less about the police. They lie about police deaths only because of their hatred for Donald Trump. 

WHAT HAPPENED WAS AN ARMED INSURRECTION AGAINST AMERICA

This claim is similar to the first claim I listed and it is the most important point I'm making against the FBI. They are treating this as if it were some large scheme against the Union; a violent insurrection against the United States of America. The dumbest Special Agent in the Bureau knows this was not an insurrection against the country. Like so many protests, especially during the last three years, this was a legitimate protest over apparent election fraud. And there was election fraud. Still whether you agree or disagree isn't the point. The point is that on January Six there was no armed insurrection against this nation by anyone. 

First of all in order to have an armed insurrection against the United States of America you have to have an army of people with guns. A lot of them. And the army you bring better be very well trained, organized and equipped. No one in this army brought any guns at all. There was no evidence of any large scale training or organization. And it looks like about ten thousand people were present on the grounds for the protest waving 'Tump' flags and American flags, Gadsden flags, all sorts of flags. There might have even been some 'Stars and Bars' flags from the Confederacy, but I haven't seen any photographs of that. It is a morally bankrupt argument to try to sell that protest as an insurrection. 

Democrats want us to believe that several thousand well organized people couldn't have disarmed a hundred and seventy five poorly armed and ill trained police officers and forced entry into the senate chamber where the electoral college ballots were being counted? The FBI is intimidating people into confessing to crimes they didn't commit. The protest was not at all well organized and neither was the police force that deployed that day. It is very clear that the police didn't feel like their lives were in danger except for the coward already mentioned who murdered an unarmed woman inside the Capitol that day. 

THE FBI DISGRACED ITSELF; AGAIN

They couldn't manufacture enough evidence to prove Donald Trump colluded with the Russian government to help him win the election and they really did try. They even coerced a army general into confessing to lying to the FBI knowing that they had already forced him to spend every cent he had defending himself against false charges they made up. After many hours of interrogation over several days they were able to find a statement that appeared inconsistent with another statement he had made weeks earlier and they decided to charge him with lying to the FBI.  

He knew he was innocent, he also knew he was bankrupt so he plead 'guilty' so the entire FBI induced nightmare would be over. A disgraceful judge, Emmet Sullivan, told General Flynn he was disgusted by his conduct. He should have been looking into a mirror.  

They tried to manufacture enough evidence against President Trump to help the democrat Congress impeach him on two separate attempts at removal from office. They lied repeatedly to federal judges so they could conduct electronic surveillance on Candidate Donald Trump and they paid informants to spy on Candidate Trump. It is actually a crime to knowingly falsify an affidavit to a FISA court, unless you work for the FBI. Evidently a FISA court judge was at least worried about the appearance of impropriety between the FBI and the court so an 'investigation' was conducted after which an FBI lawyer was scapegoated into pleading guilty to a charge that he falsified an internal FBI memo which caused a Special Agent of the FBI to file a false affidavit. 

The FBI attorney was named Kevin Clinesmith. He was convicted of falsifying the memo, or something like that, and given twelve months probation and ordered to complete 400 hours of community service. He also was allowed to suspend his own law license for a year. I'm not sure how that works. I doubt he ever even completed four minutes of his community service sentence. It does pay to be on the winning side, especially if you are a democrat. And now they are trying to manufacture evidence to prove Donald Trump led an attempted coup against the United States of America. I can't say it enough; the FBI has disgraced itself, possibly for all time.  

It can't happen as long as Uncle Joe is president, but as soon as we elect a president with integrity and courage (Donald Trump) the FBI cannot be cleaned out. The entire upper floor of the J. Edgar Hoover building needs to be publicly escorted from the building. Then a search of the entire country needs to be conducted to find someone, whether inside the FBI or among the many dedicated county sheriffs, who has the ability to overlook the politics of the president and tend to the business of enforcing the law and defending the country against spying from other countries which is much more important than participating in the overthrow of the United States government. 

We need the FBI so it has to be cleared of all of its corrupt leaders as soon as possible. The longer the Directorship of the FBI is allowed to work outside the law the greater the risk that the entire organization will become corrupted. A lot of people think FBI agents have been rogue for l long time. It is well known that they cheat when they feel the need and sometimes the result of their sloppy work has terrible consequences like the well known fiasco at Ruby Ridge Idaho, and David Koresh in Texas. The FBI may occasionally stumble onto something major, but usually I think when they make a big discovery it is something that has been handed to them by another intelligence gathering organization from a country looking for a favor from the USA. Corrupt or not, the FBI would be a good thing to have in your pocket.

Seriously, for about seventy years just about everyone in the country thought the FBI was an agency to be looked up to and trusted completely. Now there are very few people who have any faith in them at all. And the Department of Justice is just as recked as the FBI. The swamp does need to be drained and the swamp creatures need to be sent home in disgrace before the entire country disintegrates.  

 

Big Baad D.A.

Alvin Bragg won't be intimidated. What a brave man he must be. He is breaking the law and attempting to intimidate other people and he claims he won't be intimidated because he has finally bullied the wrong people. Even if Donald Trump did pay a woman money to stop saying embarrassing things about him, who cares? Whether she's telling the truth or not why was she trying to publicly humiliate Trump and his family? Whenever a democrat get's caught cheating on his wife it's always, "Look everybody does it!" or when they are reminded about their transgressions when they are picking on someone else who did the same thing their guy did its always, "Hey, two wrongs don't make a right!" 

I guess in a way it must be nice not having a conscience. If you have no conscience you really have nothing to worry about ever. You can say or do whatever you want and then deny you did it or justify your actions; sometimes both, depending on which way the wind blows. Not many people could look at a porn star and gush, "Wow! What a savvy business woman!" We all know it's dirty work, and a disgusting way to make a living and no decent woman would debase womanhood in such a foul and degrading way, but Stephanie Clifford has. The on again and off again hero to the democrat party is back in the news. And she is a hero. I was always told in my youth that we were known by the company we keep. The point was if you hang out with shady people it won't matter what type of person you are, you will be seen by others as someone who is untrustworthy. 

Does anyone even remember Michael Avenatti? He's another democrat hero. Why is he one of their heroes? Because he had the courage to defend a porn star who had the courage to try to publicly humiliate a public figure and his family. And of course she didn't expect anything in return; she is an honest woman who only thought the world should know that Donald Trump was one of the thousands of men she'd been with. And she was afraid his wife and kids didn't know so she was going to be honest and virtuous and brave and she didn't want anything in return. She was just being a good citizen who wasn't looking for any reward. Of course Michael Avenatti is also a virtuous man who occasionally works pro bono for a sympathetic cause. And there is no better cause than helping a porn star embarrass a political candidate right? 

Avenatti wasn't in it for the money either. Of course no one really knows why else he would be involved. As it turns out he really didn't need the money since he was in the process of bilking his regular clients out of millions of dollars. Because he is a valiant man, a man of great passion, virtue and truth he agreed to help this poor defenseless woman pro bono. A man who only wants the world to be a safer place for everyone. And democrats were so enamored of this dynamic duo they were already planning the campaign slogans for Michael Avenatti, Man of the People! The future president of the United States of America! Every cheer squad in the journalism business was touting the virtues of this great man. He was going to make a great president someday according to all of the talking heads at the usual cheer locations; CNN, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CBS, they were all gushing over this great heroic man. Any man with the courage to stand beside this soiled dove, this virtuous porn star who wants nothing more than to leave that life behind and help make the world a safer place, free from despots like Donald Trump. 

Whew! I think some of them hinted at the possibility of an Avenatti/Daniels ticket. Now that would be something to see. A thief and a porn star in the White House (kinda like Uncle Joe and Kamala?). Unfortunately I'm not at all certain they would have lost. I am quickly losing my confidence in the American people. Even Donald Trump is a poor presidential candidate, but currently he's the best we have to offer. He's smart, hard working and aggressive, but he has very little diplomatic capability and I'm not sure he has any patience with those who do. Given a choice between a thief and a porn star or a hard working businessman with the courage to say the things that need to be said, and follow through by doing the things that need to be done, I'll take the latter.

Like so many democrat heroes Avenatti was sentenced to fourteen years in prison for stealing millions of dollars from his clients. Alas, leaving the virtuous Stephanie Clifford out in the cold to fend for herself. A poor helpless woman, a woman of virtue who only wants to make the world a better place and in order to do that she has to shame a man who has never harmed her, and hurt his family. There is no way to know if she is telling the truth or not, but there was a way to get this virtuous woman of great courage to stop telling her story and you guessed it. She didn't get involved for the money but for a small sum she would be willing to stop telling her story. So a payment was agreed upon, she got paid, and she shut up. She had done her civic duty by telling the world Donald Trump was a scumbag who took advantage of her so there! Now you know. And now that my courageous and virtuous lawyer is in prison I guess I can forget about ever becoming Vice President of the United States (or whatever this place is called; it's kinda pretty though) so I'll just go back home. 

And she did. Until a marionette in the form of Alvin Bragg came along and started doing George Soros' bidding. And democrats continued their quest to demolish the Trump family. Donald Trump collaborated with the Russians, he's a traitor. Melania used to be a model. We've seen pictures of her naked. What kind of a woman would make a living selling herself like that? And his kids. Donald and Eric hunt poor defenseless wild animals. And that Tiffany is an airhead who is only famous because of her dad. And Barron? Well he's kind of young and we don't really like him very much but we're not sure why, and even a democrat knows that picking on a child is dangerous business, not a bad idea but it could blow up in your face so we'll just leave him alone for now. Two attempts to remove President Trump from office via impeachment failed even with two Republicans participating along with the democrat lynch mob, Sorry dems, no criminal indictment there either. No evidence that he's a traitor, and the J6 thing? Well it's a little thin too. President Trump did not plan or intend to start an insurrection against the United States of America. Nobody did. There was no insurrection. 

So there sits little Alvin What's his Name in his big office in Manhattan. Oh yeah, Bragg. What a fitting name for a guy who is about to ride his fiery steed into the Little Big Horn valley to get massacred. Like Custer Bragg has no idea what he is getting himself into, but unlike Custer his only motivation is hate. He hates Donald Trump. Not dislikes or disagrees with, but hates. He is a good little democrat. Not overly bright but that's okay. He's doesn't have to know all that much about anything he just had to get himself elected then follow the instructions he was given by his handlers. Even Alan Dershowitz who is hardly a Republican has a big issue with what the democrats have done with Donald Trump, and one of the very few things I would probably have in common with Dershowitz is respect for the Constitution of the United States. Dershowitz is appalled by the flagrant disregard democrats are showing the Constitution. 

Actually my problem with Dershowitz is his willingness to intentionally lie to a judge and jury in order to make sure a man he knew murdered his ex-wife and her boyfriend avoided a guilty verdict just because the man on trial was willing and able to pay him a ton of money. As much as I hate it, that is what defense attorneys are supposed to do. Alan would probably be among the first to admit that in any court the truth doesn't matter. For one thing it is difficult to know what the truth is in many cases, but in the OJ Simpson case the truth was clear. When OJ brutally stabbed his wife and her boyfriend to death he accidentally cut himself in the process and bled at the scene of the crime, leaving drops of blood on the ground at the crime scene, inside his Ford Bronco, in the driveway of his residence, and in his clothing. Obviously Alan Dershowitz is smart enough to know that a blood trail like that can only happen if the guy who committed the crime was bleeding. Dershowitz may be a liar, but lying is not a crime. Suborning perjury is a crime, but one that is difficult to prove. Nobody saw Simpson kill anyone so there is really no proof that he did. Except for the blood trail he left that led the police from his ex-wife's house to his house. 

How did his blood get there? That's obvious; Dershowitz theorized the police wanted to frame OJ Simpson. The problem with that is OJ Simpson was a hero to most police officers before he practically cut off his ex-wife's head in front of her house while their children slept upstairs. Simpson was a professional football player and he had been in a few clever commercials and appeared in a couple of movies. He appeared to be very likable. He had even employed a few Los Angeles police officers to work for him off duty as security officers. There was absolutely no reason why they would want to frame him for such a horrific crime. They really hoped he didn't do it. And what OJ did after murdering his ex-wife, the mother of his children, was probably necessary if he didn't want to be convicted of a crime, was understandable even if it was unforgivable; he left his two young daughters alone sleeping upstairs. 

Alan knew all of this and he still made up multiple stories in an effort to distract the court from the evidence. One of the theories why the police would want to frame a man as popular as OJ Simpson was because of his race. After all the LAPD was notorious for its racism against black people and as anyone could see Simpson was a black man. And a star struck judge made Alan's job even easier by allowing such things as racial bias to be introduced during the trial. The judge further assisted the defense by allowing them to put the prosecutions DNA analyst to a test that lasted for a couple of days and was designed to put jurors, judges, and anyone else paying attention to sleep. The custom in criminal and other court cases is to allow the defense and the prosecution to attack the scientists credibility by asking questions about the expert's background, training, and education, including any certification the expert had been awarded, not to make him read DNA charts that even the defense really didn't understand. The judge was on TV and he seemed to enjoy the attention he was receiving so he let the defense do whatever they wanted. But even a man like Dershowitz, a man who admittedly will lie for money and has been a knee jerk democrat his entire life, now believes that perhaps we should respect the law. I don't know why the transformation took place but I welcome it. 

And Alan says what the House of Representatives did was a horrible violation of everything sacred. They knew Donald Trump was not guilty of collusion with the Russians and they still held their sham impeachment process. Twice. Once for abuse of power and obstruction of justice, and the second time for incitement of insurrection. Alan Dershowitz, arguably an expert in criminal law since he practiced it for decades and has taught it for decades has become troubled over the reckless way in which the law is being applied now. Even he sees a multi tier system of justice as dangerous to the survival of America. If whichever party is in power is allowed to charge people in the opposite party with a crime for which there is no evidence that a crime was even committed, then all of us are in real danger. 

That is precisely what was being done in Congress, until Americans finally woke up enough to oust democrats from power in the House of Representatives, and now since Congress failed, and even a democrat owned DOJ failed to file any criminal complaint in the porn star civil case, somehow a district attorney from New York City wants people to believe that he thinks he has enough evidence to indict a former president of the United States for a criminal offense. Normally when we say no one is above the law we are talking about rich and powerful individuals who are escaping the clutches of justice because of their position. In this case we are talking about a wealthy man who was president of the country who lost his bid for re-election during an election process that a lot of people think was tainted. President Trump didn't try to hide his frustration with a process he thought had been violated, and voiced his objection to a lack of any real investigation into allegations of election fraud. Literally millions of Americans agree with him. A lot of us wanted to see an actual investigation and we never did. All we got was a statement from someone saying there had been an investigation and there was no evidence of fraud. 

After the presidents speech there was a protest at the Capitol building that turned into a riot during which the capitol police murdered an unarmed woman. Since then democrats have been in a frenzy to prove that President Trump orchestrated an insurrection against the USA. Democrats spent over a year trying to prove Trump was guilty of committing a crime that never occurred. Failing that they resurrected the porn star. Since Trump paid her to stop spreading rumors about him he must be guilty of something so they subpoena'd all of his financial records and they think they found a book keeping error they can use to send him to prison. Once again since no crime occurred it is going to be impossible to prove anyone committed the crime. Stephanie Clifford couldn't stop talking about Donald Trump until she reached a financial agreement with Trump's lawyer. Once payment was received she stopped talking about him. For Stephanie it was all about the money. 

Dershowitz is not a Trump supporter but he is still concerned about this pending prosecution because not only is it unprecedented for a former president to be arrested, but Donald Trump is a candidate for the presidency in the 2024 presidential campaign. Among the many potential problems Mr. Dershowitz has outlined is the corruption inherent in the Manhattan district attorney's office. The joke has always been that in Manhattan the DA can get an indictment for a ham sandwich. Mr. Dershowitz has pointed out that in Manhattan you can also convict a ham sandwich and he thinks that could easily happen in an area where the district attorney will be able to impanel a jury of Trump haters who are eager to convict him if there is any evidence or not. They could easily be thinking, "This is Trump we're talking about and he lies about everything. Now we have a chance to punish him for his past lies and so he is guilty..." 

That could easily happen. And now this idiot district attorney is facing the possibility of being somehow forced to appear to testify before Congress. Democrats are of course demanding that Republicans stop harassing the district attorney and let him do his job. And of course that is exactly what Republicans want the district attorney to do. In Manhattan the district attorney has announced he will refuse to prosecute certain cases including resisting arrest and obstructing governmental administration in some situations. Included in the list are selling narcotics and prostitution. It looks like Alvin is pro crime. If resisting arrest is not a prosecutable crime why would any police officer risk being sued for making an otherwise legal arrest? 

On the surface it looks like Donald Trump has nothing to worry about, but as Alan Dershowitz has pointed out, this proposed arrest will be carried out with the district attorney knowing he doesn't have enough evidence to convict, and possibly knowing there isn't even enough evidence to show that a crime occurred. Like most bullies Mr. Bragg wants desperately to be considered a danger to anyone who dares to stand up to him. Apparently he hasn't been paying attention because all indicators are that Donald Trump is the one who won't be intimidated. I challenge any democrat to explain to me why we need prosecutors who refuse to prosecute criminals. 

Even if Bragg is lucky and somehow secures a conviction by selling his fiction to a sympathetic jury he won't stand any chance at all at the appellate level. I really think he is doing Donald Trump a favor. That booking photo is going to be on millions of t-shirts all across America. He is going to find out that even a few democrats hate a bully and they will cross the line and support Donald Trump over his demented opponent and his cackling hyena. And the police officers of the NYPD stand to make a lot of money on overtime. Now democrats are going to feel the wrath of Republicans who have finally been pushed too far and are going to protest. Most of them will be peaceful, but they will be infiltrated by a handful of hate groups and there will be violence and people will get hurt, I just hope they will respect the police. The police officers are not there to support either major party. It is a fair assumption that even in New York City a lot of the police officers are Trump supporters.

So I hope the protesters are peaceful. I hope there are a hundred thousand of them choking the sidewalks. Their voices need to be heard and democrats need to feel the righteous indignation of a group of Americans that are not the enemy, we are all citizens (I know democrats hate that word) of the same country. We need to listen to each other and respect each other. Stop the name calling and the demagoguery. And if at all possible stop that madman district attorney. Talk sense to him. If he manages to bring his case to trial even if he wins he will look like a fool. If you hate Donald Trump fight him with ideas and goals, not with fake investigations and illegal prosecutions. There is no need to make him a political prisoner like democrats are doing with the J6 protesters. Far too many of them are being imprisoned for crimes they didn't commit. 

Stop prosecutorial misconduct. Restore the respect for our system of justice. Keep the blindfold on Lady Justice because that is such an important ideal to work for. And let's elect district attorneys who respect the law and have no respect for people who break the law. We need strong district attorneys who want to put criminals away. 

Democrats really are Fools

Protesting is a very old sport in America. In the days leading up to 1776 Colonists protested a lot. The king was pushing them around and they were starting to resent it. The two most famous protests were the Boston Tea Party which was a peaceful event during which patriots boarded ships at night and threw hundreds of boxes of tea into Boston Harbor after Great Britain imposed a duty on tea. The other famous protest became known as the Boston Massacre. Colonists were throwing snowballs, and other things at a group of British soldiers who ended up firing their rifles into the crowd killing five civilians. An officer was subsequently tried for murder and convicted of manslaughter. His sentence was to have his thumb branded with the letter 'M'. 

Both of these protests were the beginning of a much larger protest; the American Revolution. And the American Revolution was fought against the king of England who kept taxing the Colonists without allowing them to have a voice in the British parliament. There were lots of protests actually in those days which lead to 'The Shot Heard 'Round the World' when a bunch of British soldiers were ordered to march to Concord Massachusetts to disarm a Colonist militia they believed was operating in the area. The colonists didn't want to be disarmed and opened fire on the soldiers. It became known as the shot heard around the world because no one could believe that a small bunch of colonists with little or no military training would dare to try to take on the most powerful country in the world.

They did and they won. Today democrats are acting like they are a parliament passing laws that encroach on everyone's liberty. Americans have grown fond of the First Amendment. They liked being allowed to say what was on their mind without fear of government interference. Democrats have protested violently to take away that right. We cannot disagree with such things as abortion, global warming, and transgender equality without risking our livelihood and our standing in the community where we live. 

Democrats are so angry about the First Amendment that they attack people with whom they disagree in a variety of public places. A Republican governor was having dinner with family members in a famous Washington D.C. restaurant when a group of democrats angry at the governor's stand on just about everything surrounded their table and began shouting at them and telling them they were not welcome there or anywhere else in Washington D.C. The restaurant manager then joined the chorus and demanded that the family leave. Incredibly before leaving the governor paid the bill for their partially eaten meal. I don't if that included a tip but I'd be surprised if it didn't. That doesn't seem very open minded to me. You can talk to a Republican about anything without fear of any type of attack. Republicans have their faults, but they are not closed minded bigots. They may disagree with a person but they will listen politely. 

The USA today has become frighteningly divided. Republicans oppose just about everything democrats want because they just don't see the need to destroy our nation to appease a political party. If something is needed then both sides can get together and agree upon the best way to accomplish the goal. Neither side will get everything they want, but both will get something. That honorable and respectful way used to be considered the strength of America. Now any negotiation begins with the lead democrat telling the Republican representative something like, "This is the way it's gonna be like it or not! If you disagree get over it because there can be no negotiation since we've already decided what will be done!" Then they start telling the world how a bunch of racists Republicans disagree with their ideas because Republicans are afraid to do anything that would help black people. Then Black Lives Matter shows up to 'protest' and ANTIFA shows up to 'counter protest' which only means that both sides get to burn buildings and cars and loot businesses until there is nothing left, maybe kill a police officer or two, go home and watch themselves on TV. And if by accident a couple of them get arrested a handful of democrats will pay their bail and once they are free they are never heard from again until the next riot. 

In the days of King Barry it was always, "Sit Down, Shut Up!" "We Won, You Lost!" Until democrats finally have decided to take the same road as the king's army in 1775. The democrat party is so afraid of a free and open election process that they have decided that they have to use whatever means they can think of to ensure Donald Trump can never become President of the United States again. They lied during two impeachment hearings in an effort to illegally remove him from office when he was president. During his two election campaigns the FBI lied repeatedly to FISA courts, claiming that Donald Trump was colluding with Russia to get them to help him win the election. They resorted to illegal wiretaps and getting informants to work inside the Trump campaign. The goal was to find enough dirt on him to ensure he could not be reelected. The fact that they didn't find anything, at all, speaks volumes about how innocent he was. It also speaks volumes about how low the FBI has become. 

And he was not reelected. There is a ton of evidence that the election was not the orderly process it was designed to be and there were multiple irregularities at lots of polling places. There were complaints filed and legal briefs presented, but no actual investigating ever took place beyond asking the guilty parties if they had followed the rules. Each of the guilty parties thus 'interviewed' said they followed the rules to the letter and that nothing was done to help either major party have an advantage over any other party. And since democrats never lie about anything that was the end of the 'investigation'. And the investigation lasted a couple of weeks. 

Having failed at every attempt to stop Donald Trump politically democrats have decided to try to stop him via false allegations of criminal activity. The democrat party has become so reckless that they are about to gleefully and foolishly arrest a former president of United States who is wildly popular with a lot of people. If they thought their foolishness that led to the riot at the Capitol building in January was bad just wait until their current Idiot Du Jour, Alvin Freaking Idiot, Bragg handcuffs Donald Trump in front of millions of people. Just like they did almost a hundred and sixty years ago they will get the revolution they think they want and they very foolishly think they can win. 

I've said it for over ten years; the United States of America, very regrettably is finished. Lady Liberty was mortally wounded and her demise is very close. I say that, but there is a chance she may survive. While she is gasping for life, there is a chance that several million patriots, 1775 style, will fight back hard and kill enough democrats to save whatever is left of the Union and put it back together. It could be that although mortally wounded, Lady Liberty may be able to survive long enough on life support to be revived and rebuilt. 

Not 'build back better' like that demented fool Uncle Joe likes to say, and he sounds like an idiot every time he says it, but restored to her full glory. Uncle Joe has been caught plagiarizing several times during his pathetic life and this 'build back better' sounds an awful lot like Make America Great Again to me. Only MAGA has a much brighter and more positive sound that Uncle Joe's BBB. 

So go ahead and arrest one of the most popular presidents we've ever had for a crime that never occurred. Put him in handcuffs and endanger all of Manhattan to suit your over bloated ego. Then manufacture enough fake evidence and shop for the jury that is most sympathetic to your cause, throw in a carefully selected judge and have you lynching. Put one of the most popular presidential candidates ever in prison and see what happens. You will ensure he is elected in a landslide. An appellate judge will throw the case out, overturn the verdict with prejudice and President Trump in his righteous indignation will wreak havoc on your liberal world. 

That's not a pretty picture to any true American, but that's the picture democrats want to see. They don't care how many innocent people die, or how badly the world's economy suffers. Just like their hero, Vladimir Putin, they only care about their personal power. In the end Vlad will probably hang on to his power. He has already made a visit to a city he ruined in an effort to at least bring about the appearance of healing. The democrats will not be that lucky. They will destroy themselves and cry a river of tears as they watch Americans rebuild. Not Republicans, they are almost a disgraceful as the democrats. Republicans are timid and have allowed the country to sink to the point it finds itself in now. It will take Americans who don't like either major party to work together and Make America Great Again.  

Jacob Chansley

We've always known that the riot at the Capitol building on January 6th was not a resurrection or even a rebellion. It was a riot. A lot of us believe that there were substantial problems with the 2020 presidential election and that it is likely that Donald Trump was the actual winner of the election. The main reason we can't prove it is because there was never any effort to investigate most of the abnormalities. In the few instances where anyone pretended to investigate the people being targeted were given ample time to dispose of any evidence or to refuse to participate with the investigators similar to the sham investigation the FBI carried out when Hilary Clinton was caught storing sensitive top secret information on a private server in her home. The information on her server was probably read by every potential enemy the United States had at the time, including Chinese and Russian leaders and that was why once when President Trump was asked about a question about Bloody Hilary his answer was something like, "I don't know why don't you ask the Russians?" The geniuses at CNN, MSNBC and others, all exclaimed, "Look! He's in cahoots with Putin! He works for the Russian government! He cannot be trusted! He's a traitor....!" And they're still doing it. 

He knew about the private internet server Bloody Hilary kept and that it had been compromised and read by every spy in the world who cared to read it. He also knew the FBI was not going to do anything about it. Personally I don't know if the 2020 election was valid or not, which is a real problem all by itself, but this country has a much bigger problem. The press likes to make a big deal out of crackpot groups like 'Q-anon' that make outrageous claims that don't make any sense and should be ignored. I don't like Hilary Clinton and I believe she has been involved in the murder of some people who could have done her harm politically if they wished, but I don't believe she was ever involved in any satanic rituals involving the killing of children at a pizza restaurant in Washington D.C., that's the sort of story the press gets excited about. Some idiot claiming Hilary Clinton was involved in the ritual murder of children. They let that story play for a couple of days before debunking it. What they were hiding was the fact that they were in the process of suppressing a real news story. They worshipped Bloody Hilary and didn't want everyone to know that her private internet server, that had inadequate protection, and was loaded with sensitive top secret documents, had been compromised and read by a lot of unauthorized people. And who knows? President Trump was not for sale, but he was a businessman who had made some contacts in Russia who probably were politically connected and knew all about the information on Hilary's unauthorized server and found a way to diplomatically pass it on to the president. President Trump made it very obvious to everyone in the world that he was not sympathetic to Putin. The truth is he practically owned Putin. 

And because they know they are guilty democrats never want to open their books to anyone. And that is why there are so many of us who believe the election was rigged. They tried to rig Bloody Hilary's campaign against Donald Trump and they were very confident that they had succeeded. Fortunately they didn't and the nation was saved for at least four more years. No one knows for sure, but there is ample evidence that the election of Uncle Joe Biden was rigged. The FBI, an organization that has become hostile to our Republic, refused to investigate a computer owned by Joe's son, Hunter, that may have sensitive information implicating Uncle Joe himself and since the FBI hated Donald Trump they were not going to take any chances. Special Agent Peter Strzok sent an email to his girlfriend, Lisa Page, promising that Donald Trump wold not defeat Hilary Clinton, when Page sent Strzok an email which stated, "Trump will never be president Right?" Strzok responded, "No, no he won't, we'll stop it." The FBI had been working relentlessly to find anything that wold cast real suspicion onto Donald Trump and Strzok seemed to be ready to use his power as an FBI Special Agent to stop it. When asked about it Pete said, "Hell boys I was just kiddin' Just tryin' to impress my gal! I'd never, ever violate the oath I took." Oh, okay he was just kidding. As if he would simply come clean if he had part of a plan to kill the president. If only they would be that understanding when interviewing people who don't threaten to stop the election of the President of the United States.  

And the big shots at the FBI drew the conclusion, "Whew! That is a relief. I thought we might have a problem here, but he said he was just fooling around, trying to placate a disappointed girlfriend." And that was almost the end of it. If he said he wasn't a threat then he wasn't a threat. The fact that Strzok had repeatedly attacked Donald Trump in emails should have been a red flag to the FBI. It probably would have been if the leadership of the FBI hadn't been desperate for Bloody Hilary to win the election. For one thing, as members of Swamp leadership, their jobs were on the line. There were seventeen Republican candidates for the GOP nomination and each one of them were career politicians and they all hated Trump. Donald Trump was not a polished politician he was different. Not a Republican or a democrat, he had selected to seek the Republication nomination because he didn't think any third party candidate had a chance no matter how strong they were. And it had become painfully obvious to anyone paying attention that the democrat party wanted to destroy America and he was, and is, opposed to that. Everybody was afraid of Donald Trump. He was recklessly swing axes, telling the truth about D.C. And what he was saying was not new. Everybody knew Washington D.C. was a swamp and the people who worked there were swamp creatures and he was promising to change that. 

It should surprise no one that Strzok felt confident sending emails disparaging Donald Trump. They all hated Trump. They were all incompetent and they really didn't want that fact to become public knowledge. As the leaders of the most respected law enforcement organization in the country they wielded tremendous power. People who knew them knew they were not above cheating and breaking the law to crack a case that was important to them. I've talked to several people who have told me how they were treated by Special Agents of the FBI who were conducting an investigation into the actions of the police department they were working for. In every case I was told the agent had them sit in an interview room alone for a very long time, forty five minutes to an hour and a half before walking into the room and beginning the interview. Each person I spoke to mentioned the accusatory tone the agent used and how the agent laid out a series of 'testimonies' from other people who had supposedly already been interviewed. And each time the agent said he already knew what had happened and if the police officer 'lied' he would be charged with lying to the FBI, a felony. Each time the person being interviewed asked if he could have a lawyer present the agent acted surprised and then indignant. "Why would you need a lawyer, this is about the way your department does its training and conducts business with the public, it has nothing to do with you personally?" Then, "Look we're all in law enforcement, we know your agency is basically honest and treats the public with respect, I just need to complete this for my superiors so I can move on to the next assignment. Relax, you are not being charged with anything." 

Each police officer I spoke to said the initial interview lasted about two hours and each officer said he was then called back multiple times for interviews that were often shorter, but equally intimidating. Each one said after awhile they realized they were being foolish for allowing the interview to take place without being represented by a lawyer, but lawyers are expensive and at that time they still trusted the FBI. The interviews became gradually more accusatory, not against the officer being interviewed, but about other people. "What do you know about so and so...What happened at this incident?" 

Then the officers realized that in the file the agent was holding he had reports written by the officer being interviewed and that was part of the source for the questions being asked. The agent wanted to know specifics like what happened to evidence that was discovered at the scene, and is that standard procedure or do you sometimes do things a little differently. Then a gentle reminder, 'relax we're all on the same team here, but remember that lying to the FBI can be serious. The officers weren't lying, but they knew they didn't always follow procedures either. Sometimes some violations were overlooked for practical reasons, small amounts of dope could be destroyed at the scene or thrown away later if that was the only violation and the suspect was being cooperative. Why waste valuable time and resources on a case the distrit attorney's office was going to reject anyway? Yes the department manual was important and we were always expected to follow the law, but hell, two tenths of a gram of coke doesn't always have to end in an arrest, but yes it is a felony and now what do I do? After awhile they realized they really did need legal representation because this jackass is not on their side, just the opposite. Yeah, I did let that guy destroy his rock, and I did allow that crackhead informant to smoke a small amount of coke after he gave us some good information about a suspect we needed to find, hell I even bought him a Big Mac and a large order of fries and now this FBI genius wants me to be fired or worse because in his opinion I don't respect the department manual or the law? 

Special Agents of the FBI don't have any idea how police work is done. One of the officers who had been interrogated by the FBI was accused of 'lying to the FBI' because some of his answers were different from a previous interview. The questions were asked in such a way that it was difficult to know it was the same topic, but yeah, in a way the officer was confused enough by the questions that his answers were different. And each of them involved interactions with other police officers who had been involved in the same incident, but saw it a little differently. The FBI agent was very, very clear that he was not going to submit the lying charge to the United States attorney's office for review because it was such an obvious violation that there definitely would have been a conviction and he didn't want a police officer to be convicted for making such a simple mistake, so he just let the department's Internal Affairs Division decide what to do. And of course the officers department was more than willing to give the 'offending' officer a forty five day suspension without pay to prove that they did value the law and department procedure. I learned a great deal about how far the FBI will go to entrap a witness if possible, but if they have to just make something up that works too.

The officers knew the people in the area where they worked and sometimes a parolee was having a hard time and got a little coked up and got caught. He had a job, he was trying to help take care of his three year old child, let's give him a break this time and see how it goes. I believe the main reason for this mass overreaction to what actually happened at the Capitol is because people at the top levels of government were scared. They were afraid of hearings that were sure to come if Republicans regained control of the House of Representatives. And they knew they were guilty of manufacturing evidence, knowingly making false statements to Congress and lying to FISA judges. 

When powerful men feel threatened they are dangerous. Their fear of Donald Trump caused them to be desperate. They had a report written by a former British spy that made all sorts of claims against Donald Trump that were never verified. In fact when the FBI agents assigned to investigate the claims they only found one person to talk to and they later charged him with lying to the FBI. Not only was the Steele dossier not verified, it was unverifiable. The so-called evidence was nonexistent, but at least it had been put in a report submitted by a man they thought would be presumed credible since they considered him an expert. It was all the  evidence they could manufacture, and since Peter Strzok hated Donald Trump enough to frame him if possible they put him in charge of Operation Candidate Trump, or whatever code name they gave it. They are so incompetent or arrogant, or both, that they didn't care that Strzok had written hundreds of emails detailing his pro Bloody Hilary bias. He emailed somebody after the debate between Trump and Hilary that she should win the election '100,000,000-0.' The leaders of the FBI didn't care because they believe they are untouchable. They may not be above the law, but they are the people who would be assigned to investigate their own corruption. Nothing to see here folks, case closed. 

Never mind that a lot of us thought Trump won that debate. Some democrat had hired a retired British spy named Christopher Steele to dig up some dirt on Trump, specifically to interview an unidentified person who claimed that government officials, unknown names, had contacted the Trump campaign multiple times to try to interest them in damning information about Bloody Hilary. Mr. Steele delivered. He produced a report on Trump for Bloody Hilary and they paid him for his work. As far as anyone knows the report was total fiction. The FBI ended up with it and treated it like Holy writ. They probably didn't believe a word of it, especially after they verified that it could not be corroborated, but it was the only weapon they had so they determined to make it the center of their 'investigation' (witch hunt). 

Mr. Steele told multiple sources that he didn't know if the report was true or not, he got people to tell him stories and he wrote those stories in a report. This fable is so fantastic as to make one wonder if anybody at the top of the FBI has any conscience at all. Still Chris was a former British spy which made him an expert so that's how the leadership of the FBI presented it to the FISA court. They stated that they had absolute confidence in it and it was very damaging to Trump so the judge presented them a blank check to do whatever they wanted to Trump. Apparently there were a total of four warrants approved by the court. Later, after the warrants had been used, two of them were determined to have been granted based on false information that had been presented to the court. No one was disciplined for presenting false information. It is possible that the judge who signed the warrants didn't believe they were based on facts, but this is Trump we are talking about, so no harm no foul. It is possible that the only reason the FISA court decided two of their warrants were bogus was an attempt to allow the court to save face. 

So in that environment, one of suspicion largely created by the democrat party again, the FBI embarrassed itself by using an anti Trump report, funded by the Clinton campaign. The FBI offered to pay Steele up to a million dollars if he could offer any evidence to support the allegations in his report. Mr. Steele was unable to produce even for a million dollars. Knowing Steele's report was most likely fake the FBI forged full steam ahead with an investigation they knew full well was based on nothing but hatred for Candidate Trump. When their incompetence was made public, in an effort to save face they conducted a sham investigation of a private server that was unprotected and used by Bloody Hilary to store top secret information. 

Of course Strzok was part of that investigation and when it was completed one of the FBI findings was that Bloody Hilary had been "Grossly Negligent" with top secret documents, which is a criminal charge. After reading the FBI report Strzok suggested changing the wording to "Extremely Careless" which has no legal definition hence while very damaging to her personally it did not rise to a criminal complaint. Thus James Comey reported that no United States Attorney would file a case against a person for simply being careless. Strzok helped Comey save Bloody Hilary's candidacy again. And that wasn't the first time the FBI came to her aid. After she left a U.S. special mission in Libya, with a nearby annex practically unprotected the FBI pretended to investigate what went wrong. No one will ever know what was going on at that 'mission' but it attracted the attention of Libyans who attacked and destroyed the mission, killing Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three men assigned to defend the operation. 

The subsequent investigation cleared Bloody Hilary of any wrongdoing. In spite of the fact that she refused to answer any of Ambassador Steele's pleas for help the DOJ reported that there was nothing she could have done since there were no United States assets nearby. Of course the entire operation was and is shrouded in secrecy. Nobody will ever know what the purpose of the 'mission' was. They claim it was there to provide cover for groups fighting against Al Qaeda but not facilitating the movement of  any weapons, which probably means that weapons were stored at the site and that was what the terrorists wanted. At the very least, just the fact that Christopher Stevens was being used as camouflage for moving weapons, which makes no sense at all, would be enough for a group of anti America poorly educated, fairly well armed and murderous al Qaeda fanatics to decide to attack the compound. The subsequent hearings allowed Bloody Hilary to bravely accept responsibility for what happened that day, but only because as Secretary of State technically she was in charge of the operation. 

That's what true leaders do after all; heroically take responsibility for a failed operation while at the same time placing the blame on the people on the ground doing the work. She probably had no idea what was going on there. Washington loved her but they weren't going to trust her with sensitive information about an operation taking place right in the middle of a terrorist hotbed. It is very unlikely that President Obama knew nothing about it. It was probably an operation the CIA had hoped would succeed and maybe it did. Since we have no idea what was going on there we have no way of knowing if it succeeded or not. The FBI and DOJ had a long history of covering Bloody Hilary's tracks so they were reluctant to do anything to damage her candidacy. Unfortunately for her at that stage of the game they didn't want to look blatantly partisan so they pretended to conduct an investigation into the potentially illegal actions of Mrs. Clinton. They whitewashed the whole thing, found her to be  reckless but not criminal. And they hoped that would be enough to appease the masses. Luckily they were wrong and they accidentally saved the nation. Their allegiance to Bloody Hilary was not shaken and their loathing of Candidate Trump became stronger than ever. 

They hated Trump and lied about him and did everything they could short of assassination, which I bet was discussed at some level, to destroy him as a person and as a candidate and they failed. Candidate Donald Trump became President Donald J. Trump. The leadership of the FBI was appalled. How could this happen? Undaunted by the evidence against Strzok FBI leadership continued to allow him to 'investigate' President Trump. Finally toward the end of 2018 the FBI leadership decided they could no longer take a chance on Strzok and fired him even though their Employee Disciplinary Office recommended a sixty day suspension and a demotion. With Strzok gone the 'investigation' could continue unfettered by accusations of bias. And they kept swinging to the bitter end. 

President Trump survived two attempts by democrats and two lying Republicans to remove him from office. And he survived an attempt by the DOJ to manufacture evidence that would lead to a criminal indictment using information they knew to be false. They were so desperate to take down a sitting president that they even resorted to lying to federal judges. Of course President Trump was distrustful of the entire process. On January 6, 2020 President Donald Trump, having lost the election under very curious circumstances,  made a speech while Congress was in the process of certifying the election. There were about ten thousand people listening to him as he posited his opinion that the election should not be certified until after there had been a thorough investigation into allegations of election fraud. After his speech most of the people in attendance walked over to the Capitol building to stage a loud protest. A few dozen of the people in attendance incited violence and forced their way into the building. They broke windows and doors and there were some pretty violent fights with a few police officers. Some of the people inciting violence were probably paid informants for the FBI. That's a problem. Informants can gather information about possible illegal activity but they cannot actively engage in violence; especially against the United States of America. 

What we don't know and may never know is how extensive a role the FBI played in that protest. We do know that they had informants in the crowd. We don't know how many or what their assignments were that day. What has been learned about that day should actually be a cause for concern for every single American. The protest was overwhelmingly peaceful with very few people causing any damage to the building or its surroundings. There is lots of video evidence showing what happened inside. What it shows is hundreds of people walking around looking at displays on the walls and taking pictures of themselves with their cell phones. It also shows a lot of Capitol police officers walking around with them, apparently unconcerned by what was going on. At least if they were concerned they weren't making any attempt to escort them out of the building or detain them, which would have been very easy to accomplish. In addition to that there was no mutual aid from neighboring states, counties and  cities. Forget the national guard, where were the Maryland and Virginia State Troopers? County sheriff's departments, and finally the national guard? The video also shows some people outside the building breaking windows and forcing their way through closed doors, allowing others to enter the building, but once inside the group almost appears reverent. Except or a small number of people who continued to attempt to force their way onto the floor of the chamber where the certification was taking place while hundreds of others seemed to have no idea about any effort to stop the vote certification. None of the protesters were armed with any type of firearm. The police were fairly well armed and appeared nervous but not really scared, except for the coward who murdered Ashli Babbitt. 

In contrast to what Chuck Schumer and other idiots, especially far too many so called reporters claim, this was not in any sense an attempt to take over the country or subvert the Constitution. No Capitol police officers were killed that day as has been claimed by the democrat cheerleaders at CNN, MSNBC, and at least a dozen other so-called news outlets. Instead of murdering Ashli Babbit why didn't someone negotiate with some protesters to allow a handful of them to address the members of Congress? And it would have been painfully simple to fill that hallway with tear gas and clear that section of the building. Clearly the Capitol police are not trained in crowd control and they probably shouldn't be. The Washington D.C. police should have been there in minutes clearing streets and restoring order. A good example would be the Los Angeles Police Department that is frequently faced with crowds numbering in the thousands and they are very effective at clearing streets and even protecting buildings. I don't know why the Washington D.C. police made no attempt to help with an obviously overwhelmed Capitol police force. My only complaint with the Capitol police is their apparently extremely flawed leadership who claimed that they expected trouble that day yet still only deployed about a hundred and seventy-five police officers when their roster boasts almost two thousand. Even if some were sick or on vacation they could have deployed far more personnel than they did. If, like they now claim, the FBI really suspected an insurrection was going to take place that day they should have ensured that all necessary resources were in place to stop it. 

Obviously one reason why that didn't happed could be that the FBI wanted there to be a bloody confrontation at the Capitol so they could make Donald Trump look bad and provide more cover for their candidate which was Uncle Joe Biden, friend to the masses. I still believe the democrat party is deeply involved in an effort to undermine the Constitution and they are hoping to use activists on the Supreme Court to pass laws subverting certain constitutional protections that Americans enjoy. To help ensure that happens they have appointed carefully selected top law enforcement officials at each of the Federal law enforcement offices to lead the assault. The FBI most likely failed to show what they knew to ensure that there would be inadequate deployment of Capitol police resources where they could have done the most good. Unfortunately for them the bloodbath they wanted never occurred. 

Uncle Joe has always been corrupt to the core. He didn't just admit to intimidating a foreign government into firing a prosecutor who was in the middle of a corruption investigation targeting a company employing his drug addled son, he bragged about it. The only logical explanation I can come up with for such behavior is that he knows he is untouchable. Just the fact that Hunter Biden, a known drug addict who consorts with prostitutes and who has no expertise in any kind of technology beyond perhaps being able to use a cell phone and a cigarette lighter, sits on so many boards of directors of companies in foreign countries, and is paid millions of dollars for filling positions for which he is obviously unqualified should be grounds for a federal investigation. Especially since a pretty good chunk was deposited directly into the account of his former sister-in-law, turned lover.  Perhaps the people who own those companies really are that stupid, or maybe they are paying for access to a well placed American government official named Joe Biden. No one has even alleged that Donald Trump's family members have used their father's name to collect free money from foreign governments yet the FBI spent millions of dollars attempting to get an indictment against President Trump and made several misleading statements about tax fraud and potentially illegal business dealings with foreign agents that turned out to be totally unfounded. They were willing to swear an oath to a judge that an empty folder in their position contained criminal evidence against the President of the United States of America and nobody cares. 

Why wasn't there better protection for the Capitol building on January Sixth? No one will ever know. The agents of the FBI have no credibility with me. If they really thought there was going to be an armed assault against the Capitol building like they are now claiming, then they recklessly endangered the lives of the police officers of the Capitol police department and thousands of protesters that day. And if they didn't then what occurred on J6 was not a rebellion or an insurrection, but a semi peaceful protest during which a handful of bad apples committed violent acts, some of those bad apples were probably on the payroll of the FBI and the Justice department. And since they most likely knew there was no intent to actually harm any members of Congress then there was no need to murder Ashli Babbitt and that police lieutenant should be in prison for murder. I have no doubt that he was scared, but that alone is no reason to kill unarmed civilians. Now that the hearings have begun we know there was enough information available prior to J6 that their could be some violent individuals at the protest, and some of them might even be carrying firearms the FBI should have made sure that there were enough resources deployed that day to stop any concerted effort to enter the Senate chamber while the ballots were being tallied, or whatever they were doing that day. My question is, how long the FBI be allowed to let this nation down before someone wakes up and takes serious action against the top ranks of that once great law enforcement group? And I'd like to see the democrats do it. They need to show me they are not enemies of the United States of America. 

There was one man who really stood out that day. He was dressed in a very bizarre manner and entered the Capitol building illegally. He didn't break any doors or windows, the FBI informants took care of that, he just followed the crowd inside. He was wearing a hat with buffalo horns and he is not wearing a shirt. In his right hand he was seen holding what appears to be a spear, but is also a flag pole displaying the American flag, and there is a megaphone attached to it. He also has some large tattoos on his chest, stomach and his right arm. He is not seen doing anything at all disrespectful inside the Capitol building. He is being escorted by police officers who are not making any attempt to arrest him or make him leave the building. He is never seen using the spear in his hand as a weapon and the police never asked him to give it to them. I'm not sure why they appear to be giving him special treatment, but they certainly do not appear to be frightened by him in any way and they are making no attempt to arrest him which would have been very easy for them to do.

The fact that the FBI was able to muster enough 'evidence' to land him in prison for three and a half years is a real testament to their ability to scare people into confessing to 'lesser' crimes in order to avoid sentences of twenty years or more. Most likely they sat him in a windowless room, save for the one way mirror installed in one wall, and explained to him all of the potential charges he was facing, and all of the 'evidence' they had against him and told him that he was in fact in very deep doo doo, facing close to a hundred years confinement if he lost in court, but he could 'help' himself out by admitting to a simple obstruction charge and potentially be released from prison in as little as three short years. And if he would consent to that they could help him by putting in a 'good word' with the assistant united states attorney handling the case. So this poor guy hadn't had a decent night's sleep in days, probably hadn't eaten in several hours, hadn't been given the opportunity to consult with an attorney, and had been confined so long he was confused and disoriented, and way too broke to be able to pay tens of thousands of dollars to an attorney who was likely to sell him out anyway, submits to the deal offered him by a couple of Special Agents of the FBI who are only trying to 'help' him. 

This so-called Q Anon Shaman has been railroaded by a couple of Special Agents of the now nearly completely discredited FBI, a once completely trusted arm of the justice system. For all I know Mr. Shaman could be a real jerk or he could be the nicest guy on the block, but he has been severely mistreated by a federal justice system that has run amok. I don't think we've ever seen more than seven hundred people charged with committing the same crime in the history of America. And if the liars at the FBI have their way there will be over a thousand. And all because they hate Donald Trump. And they hate Donald Trump because he had the courage to call Washington D.C. a swamp full of swamp creatures, a metaphor for corrupt politicians and government officials, and the swamp needed to be drained. 

I couldn't care less about Q Anon or their ridiculous views on anything. They may well be a hate group, but nobody cares about them. They are a small unorganized outfit hardly worth mentioning. Democrats turn crackpots into martyrs and that is a stupid thing to do. Whether it's Black Lives Matter, the KKK, Q Anon, or whatever band of idiots that arrives on the scene I've said it a thousand times; extremists can and should be ignored. We don't need the FBI manufacturing evidence to put people in prison. It is obvious that Chansley may be guilty of trespassing but he certainly didn't threaten anyone or damage any property. He is a political prisoner in a land that used to stand for freedom. Now that Tucker Carlson has brought to light hours and hours of video evidence now we know that Q Anon Shanan is innocent as charged. If justice has any meaning in this country we have to set Chansley free and focus on prosecuting anyone, including FBI agents and their paid informants, who lied in court or when testifying at the J6 hearings. That needs to extend to anyone who lied to the FBI. And that must including their own Special Agents and to any FISA judge who overlooked justice out of hatred for Donald Trump.